Skip to content

Enemies Within – The enemy has clearly stated their intent and mission to the rest of the world…

Who Kept Putting Strzok in Charge?

A paramount question remains, does America recognize it has a serious problem, and if does, is it willing to do what is absolutely necessary to take care of that problem, effectively, expediently, and without prejudice? Certainly time is going to tell. And the time on the clock is running out.

“When there is no enemy within, the enemies outside cannot hurt you.”

Let no one say Peter Strzok failed to prove interference into the U.S. presidential election by an intelligence agency.

The more zealously Strzok pursued the idea of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign, the more convinced observers became that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), to include disgraced former acting director Andrew McCabe, attorney Lisa Page, and agent Peter Strzok, actively sought to hijack the 2016 presidential election.

When the police tell the babysitter, “We’ve traced the call… it’s coming from inside the house,” it frightens all the more because a peril within catches one off guard more than stranger danger. Peter Strzok scares more than Vladimir Putin because we expect the boogeyman to appear in foreign lands. When the monster comes from inside the house, pants-wetting time arrives.

Russia interfering in your country’s election does not terrify as much as your country becoming Russia. Strzok changing “grossly negligent” to “extreme carelessness” in James Comey’s report on the Hillary Clinton email scandal, his role in securing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court warrant to spy on an American citizen volunteering for a campaign that he opposed, and his use of a former foreign intelligence agent’s dirt-digging — funded by the Clinton campaign — on Trump to open investigations strike as if not all KGB tactics than at least Banana Republic ones.

While Strzok never uncovered anything quite so damning as Russian agents vowing to “stop” Hillary Clinton or crafting an “insurance policy” should their interference not succeed, he nevertheless remained convinced in his opening statement Thursday to the joint House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform committee “that Russian interference in our elections constitutes a grave attack on our democracy.”

Indeed, it does — and has. During the last hundred years, an American agent of the Soviet Union named Earl Browder ran for president numerous times, the Russians bribed Congressman Samuel Dickstein, ironically the founding father of the House Committee on Un-American Activities, into doing their bidding, the Russians infiltrated the administration of Franklin Roosevelt with scores of its agents, and the Russians effectively ran the presidential run of former vice president Henry Wallace. The discipline shown to stop hitting snooze after a century and finally wake up to the fact that Russians meddle seems a welcome development. But acting as though this old news, rather than the FBI using its power to aid a favored candidate, comes as the revelation seems preposterous.

In his testimony, Strzok refused to answer questions about the Mueller investigation. He cited possible FBI investigations in refusing to answer various questions relating to the bureau. He refused to share his text messages. He claimed that “if I were permitted to answer, I would,” as though legal advice from a bureaucracy trumps a U.S. Congress subpoena. The deep state imagines itself a fourth branch of government that supersedes the older three branches.

Under subpoena by the representatives of the public, Strzok showed the same contempt for democracy he displayed in 2016, when the unelected bureaucrat imagined it his duty to use his position for political purposes to save the American people from themselves. His former FBI colleague and lover Lisa Page showed similar contempt in ignoring a subpoena to appear before a congressional committee this week. Best to let Strzok testify publicly to get their stories straight.

When Strzok deigned to respond to questions, his responses raised more questions. He said “I don’t recall” in regard to sending the text vowing that “we’ll stop” Trump’s election. Later he claimed to remember much, such as sending it late at night in the context of “Trump insulting the immigrant family of a fallen war hero.” He maintains that the American people, and not the FBI, served as the antecedent to the first-person pronoun. The answer did not come with a laugh track.

An FBI agent who used foul means to spy on private citizens lamely cries foul that the Inspector General and Congress publicizes the text messages he sent on a taxpayer-funded FBI phone. Even if one were to accept the dubious premise that Strzok’s politics did not bias him as an investigator, his misuse of a government communications device buttresses the idea that he found Hillary Clinton’s use of a private server — accessed by foreign spies — to store classified material a nonissue (and certainly not “grossly negligent”). In the upside-down world of the deep state, what public officials do in public office should remain private but what private citizens do to elect the candidate of their choice merits state surveillance and spying.

Strzok led the FBI investigation into Clinton’s emails and the accusation that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians. Robert Mueller selected him to work on the special counsel’s investigation. What made the full-throated partisan totally inappropriate for work on any of these investigations made him the perfect pick to his FBI superiors and Mueller. What they did, more so than anything that Strzok did, represents the real scandal.

[Byline Daniel J. Flynn]

The American Spectator (edited)
13 July 2018

“this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal… this was the time we came together to remake this great nation.” … “We are the Ones We have been waiting for.” ~aka Barack Hussein Obama

See also

President Trump Cancels Obama/Kerry CIA Program Arming ISIS and al-Qaeda in Syria…

Top Dems Slow Rolling Ethics Probe to Delay Investigation Into Obama Leaks

The DC Empire Strikes Back


U.S. May Seek License for Russian Rocket Engines

Ex-Border Patrol Agents Warn: Politicians Helping Cartels in U.S.

FLASHBACK: Pelosi Says Obamacare Will “Create 4 Million Jobs, 400,000 Almost Immediately”…  (Video) Surreal listening to her gush over Obamacare before it was passed, literally everything she says did not come true, in fact, the exact opposite happened

CBO Report Finds Obamacare Will Push 2 Million Workers Out of Labor Market Over Next 3 Years…



Biological Health Hazard (Psychoactive Drugs): Killing ourselves as a Business Plan

SSRIs, suicide and violent behavior: is there a need for a better definition of the depressive state?


To what extent do SSRIs increase the risk of suicide or violent behavior? Recent data indicate that some SSRIs lack a favorable ‘risk-benefit’ profile for treating childhood and adolescent depression. In addition, certain recent documents have cast doubt on previous conclusions dissociating antidepressant from violence. Beyond the debate on the need for improved transparency in clinical studies, this controversy raises other critical issues of SSRI use that merit our consideration. Firstly, is there an overuse of antidepressants, and does the risk of suicide increase with the prescription of antidepressants in the whole population? Secondly, is the response to antidepressants modified during adolescence? If so, by what mechanisms? We know that SSRI treatment can trigger mood changes in undiagnosed young bipolar patients resulting in agitation and disinhibition, and such effects may lead to suicide and violence. Thirdly, recent extensive literature has shown that some cases of depression are worsened by antidepressants and new data has suggested that bipolar depression can be improved by atypical antipsychotics. Finally, current criteria defining the depressive state are very similar to those employed during the 19th century, a pre-therapeutic period. Currently, while it is recognised that depressive mood is a very broad construct, there is still only one definition in international classifications to describe a major depressive episode. There is a clear need to develop an evidence-based approach to psychiatry aiming at delineating diagnostic categories predictive of the response to treatments.


18690915 [Indexed for MEDLINE]

Henry C, et al. Curr Drug Saf. 2006 Jan;1(1):59-62.

See Also

Vortioxetine is an atypical antipsychotic and antidepressant indicated for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). It is classified as a serotonin modulator and simulator (SMS) as it has a multimodal mechanism of action towards the serotonin neurotransmitter system whereby it simultaneously modulates one or more serotonin receptors and inhibits the reuptake of serotonin. More specifically, vortioxetine acts via the following biological mechanisms: as a serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) through inhibition of the serotonin transporter, as a partial agonist of the 5-HT1B receptor, an agonist of 5-HT1A, and an antagonist of the 5-HT3, 5-HT1D, and 5-HT7 receptors. SMSs were developed because there are many different subtypes of serotonin receptors, however, not all of these receptors appear to be involved in the antidepressant effects of SRIs. Some serotonin receptors seem to play a relatively neutral or insignificant role in the regulation of mood, but others, such as 5-HT1A autoreceptors and 5-HT7 receptors, appear to play an oppositional role in the efficacy of SRIs in treating depression.


Vortioxetine is an antidepressant that affects chemicals in the brain that may be unbalanced. Vortioxetine is used to treat major depressive disorder in adults. Vortioxetine may also be used for purposes not listed in this medication guide

Truth testing the narrative

It is by blind and ignorant acceptance of dogma that man gives up his free spirit and his liberty of thought and hands them over to the orthodoxy-makers. In his choice of creed (i.e. to which extent he is prepared to believe in what he does NOT know), a man unwittingly discloses his limitations of logical thinking — the more mysticism, the less reasoning.

How The South Won The Civil War

(See Image at site. May be offensive to those overly politically corrected)

Most people have trouble separating cause and effect because it requires diligence, analysis, and creativity to understand that a cause is separate from related events. For example, a proposed plan may have disadvantages, but the causal question is whether or not it achieves what it intends to achieve.

In the same way, people have trouble understanding historical causes versus pretexts, touchstones, and political justifications for war. Many still think that the Civil War was about slavery, when in fact it centered on the issue of autonomy for the states.

The North wanted to capture the Southern economies because, as producers of cotton, the South was charging high prices for the raw materials the North required to make into textiles. Vertical integration, or ownership of those Southern farms, would make more money for the North, whose economy was otherwise becoming unstable.

For those in the South, the question of war went back to the founding of America: were we a confederation of states, where each region could have its own rules, or a single federal entity, where each state was responsible for the fortunes of every other? The former favored Southern agriculture, where the latter demanded vertical integration.

One hundred and fifty-seven years later, we have our answer. Conservatives and Leftists are discovering that we cannot coexist. Under the confederation model, we would each have our own semi-autonomous states and be less reliant on the federal government. Thanks, however, to the Northern win, we have a highly centralized government.

Where force of arms could not prevail, the force of history has. Human groups cannot coexist because they are headed in different directions, whether ethnic, cultural, religious, racial, or political. Democrats now realize they cannot coexist with us, and we cannot have one leader for both factions. The USA is a dead letter, as is the EU for the same reason.

This means that the South won: their model has been proven correct, and denial of that model has proved fatal for the supposed winners of the war. Instead of keeping the nation together as a defender of its states, we got ideological government that embarked on two disastrous world wars and many other pro-democracy invasions.

In this way, the United States followed the model of post-Revolutionary France which, finding its economy collapsing because egalitarian policies subvert order, embarked on a world war to conquer Europe and convert it to democracy and equality. This set the stage for WW1 to follow, which essentially shattered Western morale.

Centuries later, the pleasant-sounding lies told by egalitarians shake out. We cannot coexist; conservatives need to go our own way, and our methods do not fail, unlike Leftist ones. They may win in the short term, but as they are collapsing like Napoleon or the Soviet Union, it is clear who was right all along.

[Byline Brett Stevens]

Amerika (edited)
25 June 2018

Runes And The Origins Of Writing by Alain de Benoist (2018) | Human Organizations

Consider, that if you are dealing with someone who has considerable money, political power, etc., you must realize that they probably won’t try to directly harm you themselves, but they will enlist or contract with narcissists with weak minds, and no moral or ethical compass to make the hit. Across the board, malignant personality types are cowards and will not expose himself or herself to personal danger if they can avoid it. These people are mentally ill and extremely dangerous! But of course we know that if we happen to watch the Mainstream Propaganda, right?

Reality forces them to continually choose between recognizing the emptiness and historical absurdity of their core beliefs or holding themselves hostage to those beliefs by escalating their commitment, no matter what foul means may be required to make reality conform to their fantasy.  –Paul Murphy, American Thinker. 2017/05/21

Why the hell do they want to come and live here then?

Poll: In U.S., Record-Low 47% Extremely Proud to Be Americans

“It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.” —Voltaire 

Texas border town becomes center of immigration fight


“When there is no enemy within, the enemies outside cannot hurt you.” ~ African Proverb.

The paradigm of “Sanctuary cities established throughout the United States discourage even the most basic law enforcement initiatives within their boundaries against (migrant) predatory criminals,” they are, “Encouraged by Congress and a disinterested mainstream news media, these havens deny the American public their constitutional right to national security and (recklessly endanger) public safety while providing relative safety for dangerous foreign criminals.

“Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times, it’s enemy action.” ~ Ian Fleming

The enemy has clearly stated their intent and mission to the rest of the world…

When are Americans going to wake up and see, that it isn’t about race at all. It is about incrementally imposing communism?

Communists disguise their genocide of the masses far better than the Nazis did.  In fact, the victims of communism are clearly disproportionately misrepresented in dogmatically entrenched, pro-Communist academia, mass media, entertainment industries and other propaganda outlets.

Maybe it’s just that some have forgotten or they have never really lived in one of the imaginary utopias at all?

Communism Victims Remember

“‘The organizer’s first job is to create the issues or problems,’ and ‘organizations must be based on many issues.’ The organizer ‘must first rub raw the resentments of the people of the community; fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression. He must search out controversy and issues, rather than avoid them, for unless there is controversy people are not concerned enough to act.…An organizer must stir up dissatisfaction and discontent.’” –The Alinsky Bible


There are a plethora and steady diet of media headlines that support this, and sadly enough, most of them originate within America itself,  being ‘triggered‘ by leftist, socialist/communist political factions, they have not only validated, but more than proven the most ridiculed and archaic McCarthyistic ideas.

Question is, why haven’t these individuals and/or groups migrated to the very locations that is more attuned and suited to their sympathies, and where they would be much more comfortable wallowing in their collective ideological pig’s sties instead of remaining in America, crapping, slinging mud, and polluting everyone else’s life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness?

Perhaps, its because elsewhere they would incur severe penalties for such regime-destructive thoughts, and actions, or maybe not. However, Cuba, North Korea, Afghanistan, Indonesia and Venezuela do come to mind. But at the least there would be the opportunity to continue to build and live, or die, in that fabulous utopian fantasy their delusional apocalyptic minds have constructed.

So, why aren’t they doing this?

Thought so.

Meanwhile, on the unhinged fringes ….

Watchdog says Maxine Waters inciting ‘mob violence,’ presses ethics complaintEthics complaint filed against Maxine Waters

Welcome to Animal Farm

Maxine Waters District 43 is the worst in LA. She’s been an elected official since 1990 and her district looks like hell. Of course she doesn’t live there she lives in a multi-million dollar mansion outside of her district. Shameful.


— Kevin W (@kwilli1046) July 5, 2018

“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogma.” –Brock Chisolm, Director, U.N. WHO

United States Holds the Line During Discussions on the U.N.’s Gun Control Programme of Action

U.S. Promises “Full Implementation” of UN Gun-control Agreement

All in all. Fact is, “The devil’s in the details.”  Decide for yourself.

Censored elsewhere:

The Declaration of Independence


In other news, Poetic Justice works like that: Lions kill and eat at least three rhino poachers at South Africa nature reserve


Each raindrop falls to its extinction and with it’s death it brings life to that upon which it has fallen. –Meditations

One thing I’m almost certain of is, if I were to state what I truly believe, not only would I be deemed a heretic, but would likely be crucified, the dead that I knew would probably roll over in their graves. But I will ask this question, if the Judeo-Christian-Islam-Mormon, etc. religions are considered the spiritual icons of mankind? Why are they and their elite priesthood and those that govern them housed in wealth and splendor when many of the people that they attend to are struggling or impoverished.

Of course everyone cannot necessarily be wealthy, but building icons of religious exploitation of people seems to somewhat mirror the story of The Tower and the confusion of language in the concept of Babel.

So why exactly would religions want to condition our minds to exploit our beliefs into their own profits?

Perhaps John’s documented mystical revelation was, in its original form, written about religious applications to world-centered government as a means to destroy the notion and belief of a God that transcended religion in its nature. His use of allegories, metaphors, and symbology also transcends the manipulative theologies that religions would and have evolved into and applied to it.

What if…Eschatology and stories of the end times were never meant to manipulate, but to educate those willing to seek out the truthful meaning of things as opposed to the conditioned doctrines and dogmas they as the ‘laiety’ have been fed throughout their social and psychological development.

As I look deeper and into the historical context, aside from the many interpretations and misinterpretations that are out there, It becomes easier to recognize just how diabolical, destructive and nefarious misinterpretations can be. Especially if they follow specific agenda-driven narratives.

Of course this is just a point I’ve reached so far. It’s no wonder some people tend to go insane when they reach a point in which they are forced to reassess what they believed was accepted as some truth that actually may not have been at all. But I regress.

Maybe the biblical author of John’s Revelations was attempting to tell us, albeit somewhat cryptically, to look beyond the obvious ‘theology’ and observe what is moving the individual and collective mind in the direction it is taking. Certainly, this is a revelation well worth consideration, and for the most part looking into. At least for me personally.

Myth-making and Psycho-social programming

“To free oneself from delusion means self-knowledge, knowledge not only of one’s active deeds but also of one’s hidden motives.” ~ A.M. Meerloo M.D.

Why The Federal Government Can Now Use Propaganda On Americans

Richard Stengel, former head of the office for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs at the Obama’s State Department from 2013 to 2016, former editor of Time Magazine, and a regular pundit on MSNBC, said in April of 2018, at a Council on Foreign Relations forum about “fake news,” that he supports the use of propaganda on American citizens. He then continued and said;

“Basically, every country creates their own narrative story and, you know, my old job at the State Department was what people used to joke as the ‘chief propagandist’ job.”

Keep in mind, that in 2013 Congress passed legislation allowing the federal government to fund and create propaganda they knew could be used to manipulate Americans on American soil. This legislation was called The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, sponsored by Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-TX), that failed in 2011 when it was submitted on its own. But in 2013 Thornberry and his co-sponsors buried this legislation in the National Defense Authorization Act of 2014, where it surreptitiously was passed.

The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act overturned a prohibition against domestic propaganda that had been in place since 1948. This prohibition act was passed as a result of a series of events in American history that drew the concern of those who wanted to secure a free press and the freedom of speech of the American people. The concern began when President Woodrow Wilson established the Committee on Public Information through an executive order with the purpose of influencing American public opinion toward supporting the U.S. involvement in World War I. The man appointed to be the chairman over this committee was George Creel, a renowned investigative journalist and editor of the Rocky Mountain News.

In 1942, FDR established the United States Office of War Information by executive order to “truthfully inform” the American people about the government’s efforts in World War II. FDR appointed Elmer Davis, a well-known CBS News analyst, as director of OWI. Davis’ job was to coordinate information from the military and mobilize public support of the war. OWI was to create an avenue for the government to develop and disseminate the information that they believed people needed to know about the war.

“Our job at home is to give the American people the fullest possible understanding of what this war is about…not only to tell the American people how the war is going, but where it is going and where it came from.” (Elmer Davis. AP/Wide World)

In 1946 Rep. Sol Bloom (D-NY) introduced a bill that would grant the Secretary of State the power to give monetary, service, or property grants to nonprofit public and private corporations to prepare and disseminate informational materials. Although this act was intended to disseminate information abroad, there were no limitations to keep it from being used on the American people and opposition began to form. After having lived through two regimes of government propaganda and having seen the effects of such government propaganda machines as Joseph Goebbels’ Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, Congress decided this was not something they wanted to engage in.

An AP press release stated “government cannot engage in news casting without creating the fear of propaganda which necessarily would reflect the objectivity of the news services from which such news casts are prepared.”

The Bloom Bill passed the house but failed in the Senate. In 1948, the Smith-Mundt Act was passed with three key limitations on the government. The first and most well-known restriction was originally a prohibition on domestic dissemination of materials intended for foreign audiences by the State Department. This restriction has been supported by the courts even in the face of Freedom of Information Act challenges. In November 1996 the federal District Court in Washington, D.C., decided that the material under the Smith-Mundt Act is not to be available, applying the Freedom of Information Act’s Exemption 3 to block access.

The Smith-Mundt Act is now found in 22 USC 1461-1a titled, Ban On Domestic Activities By United States Information Agency. The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act changed all of that. This act does several very destructive things.

First, it puts the President’s Board of Broadcasting Governors on the same level of authority as the Secretary of State. The Board of Broadcasting Governors is an independent government agency whose members are appointed by the President and whose sole function is to create American propaganda and disseminate this propaganda abroad.

The Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 created a limitation for propaganda to be released in the United States. If such propaganda was requested, the information could not be released until 12 years after its publication. This was an additional protection established so that this government created information could not be used to influence current public opinion. The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, eliminated that protection. The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act not only legitimized the heinous manipulation of mainstream media, but allowed Congress to fund it with taxpayer dollars

In 2011, I wrote a detailed analysis of the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act and its potential dangers. In spite of our concerns, many congressmen were adamant that this legislation would not be used to spend tax dollars to create propaganda to be used domestically. They told us it would just be used to create propaganda on foreign soil, nothing to worry about.

Six years later, did a former State Department Official just admit he created and used domestic propaganda, and believes it’s the right thing to do? We don’t need to be concerned, right? They are just trying to keep us safe.

[Byline KrisAnne Hall, JD]

The Revolutionary Act (edited)
09 June 2018


MSNBC Anchor: “Our Job” Is To “Control Exactly What People Think”


… (There are a number of) derogatory terms used to describe refugees and asylum seekers displaced by war or other hardships … (Though some may be justified) we are being told they are (not) a problem. The media is used to play up this (blindness to the) problem in order to instigate a reaction (debate) in the public domain on how to tackle it. Both the opposition and ruling party offer their solution.

Again we see that the only real debate occurring is just the minor differences between two political parties. Nothing is said or done about the many other more important issues that neither the left or right is discussing.

In order to avoid falling victim to the Hegelian Dialectic from now on you must remember the process involved. Anytime a major problem or issue arises in society think about who will gain or profit from it. Then remove yourself from the equation and take a step back to look at it from a third party perspective. See the so-called “problem”, look at who is reacting, why and in what way. Then look for who is offering up the solution.

When you do this from now on you’ll quickly see the real truth instead of the false truth they wanted you to see.

Byline General Maddox,

The Hegelian Dialectic and its use in Controlling Modern Society, 2013 (edited)

Speaking truth to perverted myths

How Rights Go Wrong: Gender Slouching Toward Equality

This is an edited excerpt from Ashton Gray’s revolutionary book on society, culture, history, and philosophy, Created Equal: The Greatest Lie, available at Amazon, iBooks, Barnes & Noble, and other retailers. This is an excerpt from Chapter 10, “How Rights Go Wrong: Gender Slouching Toward Equality.”

It is a measure of the intellectual degradation of our times that the physical reality of these cases is considered, if it is considered at all, a distant second to the subjective impressions of people who are, not to put too fine a point on it, mentally ill and in need of treatment.”

This isn’t about whether women should have the right to fight in battle or run a government or corporation, or whether men should have the right to wear frilly bras to sports bars, so if you’re looking for a way to get your blood pressure pumped on that basis, you might want to skip this chapter. This is about insanely destructive goals and purposes versus rational constructive goals and purposes.

If you are reading this, and honestly are unable to find a host of differences between men and women, or if you believe that gender is some airy-fairy mental “spectrum,” please stop reading this right now. Seriously. Please go away. Your staying will waste your time and mine. Even my dogs clearly understand that there are two genders—male and female—so if you can’t understand this obvious and inarguable fact, you certainly won’t be able to understand a word I’m saying. Give this book to someone who hasn’t been brainwashed into vegetable status by the “experts” of academia and the psychoestablishment, and so is still able to think rationally. ‘Bye. Ciao. Au revoir. Auf Wiedersehen. Arrivederci. Sayonara. Adios.

For those remaining: To the degree that any frantic quest in the modern world for gender “equality” is an effort to satisfy the most famous hallucination of the Golem of Philosophy, John Locke, expressed by Thomas Jefferson in the phrase “all men [OMG! He must have meant ‘persons’!] are created equal,” it’s a pointless quest, a fool’s errand. It makes the Holy Grail look like something you could pick up at any convenience store. It makes tilting at windmills seem sane.

The reductio ad absurdum of a quest for “gender equality” is “neuter”—also called in some sciences “rock.” There are surgical procedures available to everyone who is on that quest. If you are on such a quest for “gender equality,” I can’t imagine why you’re still here reading this, and didn’t take advantage of the polite invitation in the second paragraph above for you to leave. If you were just gathering your bag and things, I would like to mention that availing yourself of those procedures will do a great service for natural selection, so I salute you.

Glorification of Sexual Perversion is War Against Mankind

The traditional family is the core of human existence. Heterosexual relationships and marriages came into existence as the guarantee for the future of mankind. The purpose of sex is procreation, and only heterosexual sex results in procreation. The purpose of sex is not transitory “pleasure;” sex is pleasurable so that its purpose—which is continuation of the race—will take place and mankind can go forward into the future.

Obsessive or fixated focus on sexual “pleasures” that are not heterosexual, practiced to the exclusion of heterosexual activities, are perversions. If you’re offended by the word “perversion,” you’re welcome to stop reading, clutch your pearls, and leave through the same exit door as those who left at the second paragraph of this chapter, but it’s a perfectly correct word in the English language that effectively describes the condition, “perversion” being defined as “any of various means of obtaining sexual gratification that are generally regarded as being abnormal.” The word “abnormal” means “not normal, average, typical, or usual; deviating from a standard.”

Every valid source of statistics available unequivocally reflects such sexual behavior as being abnormal, by definition. In January 2017, a Gallup poll reported that the total percentage of the U.S. population who said they were lesbian, “gay,” bisexual, or transgender was only 4.1 percent. By simple math, that means that 95.9 percent of the population is not homosexual, bisexual, or transgender. Those conditions—by statistics, simple math, and fundamental dictionary definitions—are perversions, and that’s how I’m appropriately going to refer to them.

Efforts to debase, degrade, demean, ridicule, or compromise traditional heterosexual marriage and traditional families are efforts to destroy the future of the human race. Attacks on heterosexuality are attacks on the human race. Efforts to “train” or indoctrinate children in the “acceptability” of sexual perversions, or into the “acceptability” of surgically mutilating their genitals and reproductive organs, are efforts to eradicate the human race.

That is as obvious as daylight. It is so obvious and simple that it seems that any addlepated imbecilic dimwitted blockheaded mouth-breathing knuckle-dragging moron could figure it out. That may fully explain why academic “experts” and psychiatrists and styling-salon-coiffed TV personalities can’t figure it out. This has nothing to do with any political party or any given religion; it has to do with sanity, intelligence, and ethics in a person that exceeds that person’s immediate genital area or next frantic sexual romp.

Dedicated homosexuals are people with sexual perversions. There is nothing “glamorous” or “hip” about being a homosexual who is incapable of having a heterosexual relationship and procreating for the future of the human race. It is a rather pathetic disability worthy of empathy, not hatred or disgust. Being “gay” has become glorified in the culture in recent decades only because “gays” have leveraged the Lockean lunacy of “Oh, we’re all eeeeeeeeequal to you,” and have thereby gotten into positions of power in politics and entertainment, and have thereby flooded the culture with propaganda campaigns whose only actual purpose is to destroy mankind.

The flood of propaganda for perversion has gotten so ridiculous that it’s become practically impossible to find any entertainment or “news” media that isn’t loaded and overloaded with glorification of being “gay” or some other brand of perversion. As an example, it seems that there’s not a stand-up comedian standing any more who can make it through an hour show without getting in at least one withering diatribe of infantile school-yard name-calling against people who supposedly are mentally ill with the dreaded condition of “homophobia”—which, like all Lockean lunacy, doesn’t exist. (None of these idiots are bright enough to figure out that “homo-” as a combining form means “same.” Of course “phobia” means an “irrational fear,” so in their juvenile bullying name-calling, they are accusing their targets of being “irrationally afraid of people who are the same as you.” For heterosexuals, being “homophobic” would mean they have an irrational fear of other heterosexuals. Yes, it’s all just that idiotic.)

As another example, count sometime the percentage of commentators and hosts on the “major” 24-hour “news” services and on TV networks that are homosexual (as of 2017), then compare those percentages to the actual percentage in the population. If you don’t think that is a planned, strategized, organized, and orchestrated propaganda agenda, you may qualify for the “rock” gender status—and a mental status to match.

As for “gay rights,” which really means “pervert rights,” there’s no rational reason at all that any dedicated homosexuals should have all the societal rights and benefits of heterosexual marriage and the families who are working responsibly to keep the human race going forward into the future, taking on all the responsibilities and costs of raising children, when the perverts are doing nothing whatsoever to uphold their responsibility to that purpose, and in fact are doing everything they can to debase, degrade, demean, ridicule, or compromise traditional heterosexual marriage and traditional families. The “trendy” pose of homosexual “couples” adopting children created by heterosexuals is really just a showy way to debase, degrade, demean, ridicule, or compromise traditional heterosexual marriage and traditional families.

I don’t care, and neither should anybody care, if someone wants to have sex only with rutabagas. That is a “right” they certainly have, and are welcome to, as long as they do it in private and I don’t have to be lectured endlessly about “rutabagaphobia”—through media licensed by a government that is supported by taxes—or have to deal with traffic tied up by a local government using taxes because of a “Rutabaga Partner Pride” parade.

Personally, I think it’s a very sad state of affairs when a group of people’s lives are so hollow, so empty, so meaningless, so purposeless that the only thing they can think of worth having a parade about is what they do for sex. But that’s just my opinion. What’s factual is that reports the following:

According to the National Alliance on Mental Illness, the risk of a mental health condition, like depression, anxiety disorders, or post-traumatic stress disorder, is almost three times as high for youth and adults who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT)—or those with a sexuality that doesn’t apply to any existing category.

The National Alliance on Mental Health, in an article titled simply “LGBTQ,” reports:

LGBTQ individuals are almost 3 times more likely than others to experience a mental health condition such as major depression or generalized anxiety disorder. …

LGBTQ youth are 4 times more likely and questioning youth are 3 times more likely to attempt suicide, experience suicidal thoughts or engage in self-harm than straight people. Between 38-65% of transgender individuals experience suicidal ideation. …

The LGBTQ community reports higher rates of drug, alcohol and tobacco use than that of straight people. … An estimated 20-30% of LGBTQ people abuse substances, compared to about 9% of the general population. 25% of LGBT people abuse alcohol, compared to 5-10% of the general population.

Many of the statistics on promiscuity and disease among the “LGBTQ” communities are equally grim, but they can easily be found online, so don’t need to be trotted out here. It is poignant and moving that fellow human beings are experiencing these kinds of anguishes in life, for any reason. They need care and help, not hatred or abuse.

But it’s also true that all such aberration is as contagious as plague, which is clearly reflected in the increasing percentages of such perversions among the population since the entertainment and information industries have begun flooding the culture with “glorification” of perversion. And it’s also true that this statistically tiny portion of the population wreaks statistical hell on the culture in the spread of disease and drugs, legal and illegal. Even the Centers for Disease Control—who cheerfully use taxpayer dollars to promote perversion— confessed that as of 2010 (the last statistics they had available at the time of publication), men who had sex with men were responsible for 63 percent of the new HIV infections.

Any government or business that would put or allow such perversions into positions of sweeping power and influence is a government or business with a death wish, not just for itself, but for mankind. Any school or education system that would allow these kinds of perverted influences to be put into a classroom of children under any pretext has declared war on the next generation of the human race, and is a system that should be shuttered without waiting for the next dawn.

That’s only the first part of chapter 10—and he’s just warming up! Ashton Gray is one of the most outspoken and controversial authors in the world today, tipping sacred cows and shattering fixed ideas. You’ll want to read every word of this staggering analysis of group madness that has had the world in a stranglehold for hundreds of years.

[Byline David Reznor]

Chalet Reports
28 January 2018

See Also

Bradley Manning Is Not a Woman

Individuals thinking and believing they are a special person with another gender or species that is trapped inside them is a common psychotic fantasy. By definition, they are insane, do you rationally think these are considered normal individuals?


“First, it must be understood up front that in the grand scheme of things “transgender” people constitute a statistically insignificant portion of the population. They’re so exceedingly rare as to make almost any public-policy or political argument about their treatment by society a sideshow in a true sense.” Read moreThe Left’s Breaking Point?

Mind control (also known as brainwashing, coercive persuasion, mind abuse, thought control, or thought reform) refers to a process in which a group or individual “systematically uses unethically manipulative methods to persuade others to conform to the wishes of the manipulator(s), often to the detriment of the person being manipulated.” The term has been applied to any tactic, psychological or otherwise, which can be seen as subverting an individual’s sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making.


adjective: perverted; past participle: perverted
  1. (of a person or their actions) characterized by sexually abnormal and unacceptable practices or tendencies.
    “he whispered perverted obscenities”
    synonyms: unnatural, deviant, warped, corrupt, twisted, abnormal, unhealthy, depraved, perverse, aberrant, immoral, debauched, debased, degenerate, evil, wicked, vile, amoral, wrong, bad; More

    informalsick, sicko, kinky, pervy
    “I don’t want to hear any more of your perverted stories”
    • (of a thing) having been corrupted or distorted from its original course, meaning, or state.
      “this sudden surge of perverted patriotism”