Skip to content

The complexity of the problem


When ideologues are the victim, who is to blame? And then some.

Alas, the forces of hate and change come home to roost, as promised, and in an ugly direction.

The condition:

1. Obama et al. enables Muslim extremists and urges their unvetted relocation to U.S.
2. Obama et al. encourages and promotes homosexuality. How does this reflect on the administration’s push for homosexuals in the military?
Observe any conflict between religious Islamic zealots and homosexuals? 1 + 2 = false flag event leading to:
3. Gun control.

The outcome: Unarmed citizens of any persuasion are an easy prey to control and conquer. 

“Did you really think we want those laws observed?” said Dr. Ferris. “We want them to be broken. You’d better get it straight that it’s not a bunch of boy scouts you’re up against… We’re after power and we mean it… There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that’s the system, Mr. Reardon, that’s the game, and once you understand it, you’ll be much easier to deal with.” — Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

As the silly political myths continue, compare an M4 Combat rifle (operated by a government agent) and can fire up to 700+ rounds/min, with a civilian owned AR-15 Sporting rifle that is select-fire only. Consider clip changes and barrel deformation in the mix  If it is full auto, then it probably not an AR-15.  Doing your own research may undermine the fantasy.

About that Orlando AR-15… it wasn’t

There is one small, inconvenient detail. As our colleagues at Bearing Arms point out, once we finally got a look at the weapon it turned out to not be an AR-15 at all.

The rifle used by the Islamist terrorist in Orlando was instead a Sig Sauer MCX carbine, a modular, multi-caliber (able to swap to different calibers, including 5.56 NATO, 300 BLK, and 7.62×39) rifle system that sometimes utilizes STANAG magazines common to more than 60 different firearms, but otherwise has no major parts that interface with AR-15s in any way, shape or form.

This of course, will make no difference at all to the anti-gun politimedia, who don’t particularly care about factual accuracy and who likely wouldn’t be able to tell an AR-15 from a toaster oven if their lives depended on it. — Hot Air

And for the worst mass shootings in U.S. history… Check out The Wounded Knee Massacre, 1890 Does genocidal hate crimes not count in today’s statistics?

Flashback: If You Look at This Chart of Top 10 Nations in the World for Mass Shootings – One Thing Jumps Out

Surprisingly, guns become a moot point when other types of weapons, far more destructive, are about to be used.

Without guns, another Happy Land  or worse would likely have happened:

[On March 25, 1990], what was then the biggest mass murder in U.S. history turned a New York City dance club into a smoky, flame-filled inferno that left dozens of people dead, some with drinks still clutched in their hands.

That night, a Cuban refugee named Julio Gonzalez tried to win back the woman who had spurned him.

Gonzalez entered the Happy Land social club in the Bronx, which was humming with mostly immigrants partying and dancing. His former live-in girlfriend, Lydia Feliciano, was checking coats and they had a violent argument. Gonzalez was thrown out.

In a rage, he returned just after 3 a.m., splashing gasoline on Happy Land’s only exit and lighting two matches. Then he pulled down the metal front gate.

Within minutes, 87 people were dead.

Remember, Sanity always looks like Insanity in a mental asylum run by the inmates.

So That’s Why  …Opinions from elsewhere

I contend that anyone who’s been paying attention to our ongoing fight against radical Islam understands that homosexuality and radical Islam often go hand-in-hand. You can add ‘mental illness’ to mix and still be entirely correct. None of them individually preclude the other symptoms.

Otherwise, explain the following:

— Any Western service member patrolling the tribal areas of Afghanistan and Iraq can tell you plainly about the evidence of homosexual and homosexual pedophilic relationships amongst both the jihadis as well as the people we’re supposed to be ‘allied’ with against the terrorists. Oh dear, what some servicemen have seen through NVGs and thermal FLIR sights being conducted by jihadis during an operation — and then they turn around and kill a US soldier they’re embedded with. “Man/Boy Thursday”, and so on, and even their platoon’s own attached native interpreters and cultural liasions forging homosexual relations with one another. Learn what kind of contents are in the ‘pocket litter’ that US forces have found on dead jihadis during our wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Even the NY Times reported on the huge porn stash found on Osama bin Laden’s computers and thumb drives. So much for jihadi sexual ethics, right?

— Didn’t we just bear witness to a senior US Army NCO who was courts-martialed for beating the hell out of an ANG officer who had a slave boy chained up for sexual gratification purposes on a US military base in Afghanistan? That story isn’t even a month old! It also wasn’t a one-time thing, as we learned the US military had long standing orders from the State department to ignore the open display of selling boys by the locals and even bringing them on base. They had to pretend they were family relations or work apprentices.

— Do I even need to remind you about the Afghan ‘dancing boys’ or how we found countless pictures of foreign jihadis in Kabul’s photographic studios wearing women’s makeup and snuggling romantically with their jihadi boyfriends during that Taliban’s long rule there? There’s whole websites and indie films devoted to this evidence.

— What about the several fatwas decreed by senior mullahs in the Arab nations declaring that homosexual intercourse between jihadis was determined not to be haram (prohibited) as long as it was properly conducted during the waging of jihad? Did you forget that? Literal decree of acceptance of homosexual relations amongst the keepers of the Muslim faith.

— Did you know that a great many Western-raised jihadi terrorists who have gone to Iraq and Syria to become fighters and suicide bombers for ISIS were said by the people who knew them from their homes in Sweden and the U.K. (etc.) were thought to be closeted latent homosexuals who had absolutely zero game with the womenfolk? Those stories are not few, sir. Go do some reading about how gay Muslim boyfriends decided to travel together abroad to become ISIS fighters. Several of the 9/11 hijackers were believed to be the same way with women and were hugely uncomfortable around the opposite sex in situations where there was any amount of sexuality on display. Go read about Mohammed Atta sometime.

— Not well reported in Western media, but several of those gays executed by being thrown from the roof of an eight story building in Iraq were probably ISIS fighters. It’s not like ISIS swooped up some likely homosexuals at a Baghdad gay nightclub or anything. At least some of the victims were from their own ranks, I’d read.

— Golly, not that anyone can tell who is gay or not just by looking at them, but you might want to go take one look at the photographs of the Paris attacker Salah Abdeslam and tell me if you don’t think he looks more like he belongs as a victim of the Orlando gay nightclub massacre than he does being a would-be suicide bomber.

— Here in the USA, not only do we have the new murderous fiend in the Orlando massacre who is said to have been a self-loathing homosexual but please remembers years ago we saw the DC snipers of John Muhammad and Lee Malvo who were absolutely gay man/boy lovers bent on violent jihad. That’s not even in question.

It is my suspicion that a great many of the jihadis originating from the socially and sexually repressed Arab cultures left home to go wage war for Al-Queda/ISIS/ISIL, etc. because they were a huge embarrassment to their families back home because of their suspected homosexuality despite whether its true or not that they’re really gay. If a young man cannot bear to live a miserable life as a closeted homosexual in the worst part of the world to be identified as gay, then they’ll sacrifice themselves as a suicide bomber or die in battle against the hated Western crusaders so as to bring honor back unto the family name. This would be quite a lot like how families in the Middle Ages in Western Europe sent their finocchio sons to the Catholic priesthood and their butch daughters off to be with the rest of the lesbian nuns in a distant convent. Perfect cover, you see, and forevermore their family’s shame will not only be hidden in a far off place but will be regarded in their community back home as something to be respected and esteemed. Is this too hard for you to believe? Look at the evidence!

I’ll say this much: Being an Arab homosexual certainly doesn’t automatically make someone a radical Muslim terrorist, but I think there’s pretty strong evidence that being a radical Muslim terrorist may have something to do with being medication for their own self-loathing homosexuality in a great many cases. Sure seems strange how they can just erupt into ‘Sudden Jihadi Syndrome’ after apparently living a secular life and only after they’ve committed some foul act here or abroad do we learn that the quiet loner was a hugely emotional train wreck struggling with significant personal conflict by everyone who had contact with them.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have to go elsewhere to write a screed explaining to pudding heads that if some Muslim loner commits an act of terror and self-identifies an affiliation with a known international terrorist group that we should probably believe they were being genuine about it — especially if the terror group themselves welcomes their act as one of their own deeds. It seems that some people still believe that Al-Quaeda/ISIS is a brick and mortar location with an official membership club and not a shadowy electronic recruiting presence based upon the world wide web. You know, that their recruits must satisfy some conditions of employment such as traveling to Syria and having themselves photographed wearing a chest rig and holding an AKM in front of a mud-caked Toyota truck with their index finger pointing skyward and demonstrate physical fitness by traversing the monkey bars and stepping fleetly through truck tires at a desert training camp.

I swear, it’s like some people haven’t paid a lick of attention to the evolutionary changes of the radical Islamist movement over the last decade and a half.

[Byline by The KG9 Kid] via Free Republic  (All rights reserved. No copyright infringement intended.)

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s