There is no coexisting with those wanting to destroy us from within …
There is this:
Representative Elise M. Stefanik is a young, freshman republican congresswoman from the Albany New York area. And using a probative questioning timeline, she single-handily pulled the mask from FBI Director James Comey, yet no-one seemed to notice.
Director Comey intentionally obfuscates knowledge of the question from Rep Stefanik; using parseltongue verbiage to get himself away from the sunlit timeline.
The counter-intel investigation, by his own admission, began in July 2016. Congress was not notified until March 2017. That’s an eight month period – Obviously obfuscating the quarterly claim moments earlier.
The uncomfortable aspect to this line of inquiry is Comey’s transparent knowledge of the politicized Office of the DNI James Clapper by President Obama. Clapper was used rather extensively by the Obama Administration as an intelligence shield, a firewall or useful idiot, on several occasions.
Occam’s Razor – Because the question(s), the brutally obvious question(s), then lead to the follow-up: If the only criminal activity is the sourcing of the leak, and the two people giving testimony are potential suspects in that criminal activity, then: A) How can we trust their testimony, and B) Why are we even having this hearing”? (with two people who are suspects in an ongoing investigation)…
The answers reveal the current intention of the intelligence committee is not to actually investigate, but rather to give the outward illusion of investigation.
If they were not merely giving an illusion…. Congress would be pointing out that FBI Director James Comey has a direct and specific conflict of interest that is so glaringly obvious it’s unfathomable no-one see it.
Director Comey, and to a lesser extent Rogers, would have been in direct contact with the prior administration individuals, and entities acting on their behalf, who were politicizing the information being gathered and lying about (ie. leaking to the media) the content therein.
Summary: Hillary Clinton political operatives manufactured the illusion of a computer connection between Russian entities (financial banks) and the Trump campaign/organization. Those manufactured points of evidence were then passed along to White House entities who used the political intel community (Clapper to Comey) to open an investigation of nothingness – to nowhere. The mere existence of that investigation was then used as the originating point for a series of media intel leaks (the narrative) intended to cloud and damage the Trump campaign/organization. FBI Director James Comey, as head of one of the investigative agencies, became part of that political apparatus. Now, usefulness exhausted and with the media engaged, it’s CYA time all around for the originating entities.
FBI Director James Comey has singularity of knowledge and has cleverly placed himself in a position where there is no “oversight” of his claims.
“Because of the sensitivity of the matter” ~ James Comey
“The truth can be dangerous. Some extremists will go to great lengths to keep the truth from coming out, even if that means threatening harm to to their opponents.”
Once again time has revealed the foundation on which the Obama and his Administration was constructed. The level of the domestic abuse of power instigated by this administration is unprecedented.
This administration sought to stifle all opposition and used its power to silence dissent. What the IRS, BLM, NSA, EPA and other high-level agencies are doing, and have done is organized, planned and deliberate. These are things that violate the most basic tenets of the Republic and it’s Constitution. The use of government agencies to silence political opposition is tyranny and is the greater threat to freedom from those adhering to totalitarian precepts. Those that have done these things should be imprisoned, indeed these crimes should be at the least capital offenses, if not more serious treasonous actions.
What is being experienced by the American people, is the differences encountered between isolated treason and an outright coup, and those responsible for the destruction of the country are expected to be trusted managing the it? Yet there is an increasing amount of loathing for the people who have done harm to the US, but is simply not comparable to the erupting undercurrent of revulsion they now have in store for them.
One thing to remember about objective evidence is it always stands alone and because of its self explanatory nature there is a simplicity to it. The evidence is damning and it addresses the reality of what happened. Evidence itself, like truth, is always waiting to be discovered or realized. We as humans are the ones who create rules to deflect the reality and the perception of the evidence. Commonly government will demonize the messenger to deflect from the fact that they have no defense against the presented objective evidence. –Bernie Suarez via TheSleuthJournal