Skip to content

Political Farce with The Semantical Coprophiliac Troupe

2020/05/15

“The reason we weren’t lying before, is because we came up with a ludicrous explanation which is an even bigger lie, which justifies why what we said before wasn’t true. So you should still trust us, not only on what we said before, but also what we’re saying now.”

When facts are stubborn things, the left just tell more stubborn lies

The long overdue cracking of the conspiracy to frame President Trump’s national security adviser has the left wailing.  It was a “‘black day in D.O.J. history'” when Michael Flynn was no longer going to prison.

Faced with the emergency of defending the indefensible, progressives have been busy deflecting from the crookedness coming to light, either by refusing to mention any of it in their reporting, or howling over the unimaginable scandal of the government dropping charges against a defendant who has already pleaded guilty.

Since Thursday, progressives have been saying U.S. attorney Timothy Shea’s motion to dismiss the case will go down in the annals of justice as surpassed in perfidy only by, maybe, Pontius Pilate’s decision to release Barabbas.  The critics manage this without ever engaging a single point set out in the government’s intimidating 20-page motion.  Instead, these shrill attacks all boil down to a single false and irrelevant argument, continued into this week by Donna Brazile: “It’s a fact that President Trump’s former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, lied to the FBI — he pleaded guilty to the charge.”

The same day it learned of the dismissal of Flynn’s case, the New York Times rushed to remind its readers, for the one millionth time, “Don’t Forget, Michael Flynn Pleaded Guilty. Twice.”  The next day, two of the Times’ Georgetown legal experts editorialized on why the DOJ dropping the case triggered a “sense of utter demoralization” among criminal law experts and members of law enforcement and why every American should be “shocked and outraged“: “After all, Mr. Flynn twice pleaded guilty to lying to the F.B.I.”  But saying it once wasn’t enough.  “To review: Mr. Barr is now saying he cannot prove charges to which Mr. Flynn has twice pleaded guilty in court — and for which there is ample evidence.”  In fact, the Georgetown lawyers don’t mention any evidence of Flynn’s guilt, let alone ample evidence.  Because that doesn’t matter.  Evidence is not going to be on the test.  Just remember that guilty plea.

The media are determined that if you’re going to forget anything, forget the corrupt, disgraceful frame-up of an American warrior that’s left the FBI, the DOJ, and the Constitution in a broken heap.  Forget that before James Comey sent two unethical federal agents to have a harmless chat with Flynn, he wasn’t guilty of anything, and by the time they left, Flynn’s life was ruined.  Forget that Comey’s sole purpose in sending agents to interview Flynn wasn’t to investigate anything; they were sent to trap Flynn into a lie “so we can prosecute him or get him fired.”

The brutal facts of last week’s revelations are so clear cut and straightforward — think of the invasion of Normandy or Nixon’s resignation — that no straight news reporter could conceivably lead with anything else but “this is what happened, and this is why it happened” — something on the order of “a cleaned-up DOJ withdrew a false charge that never should have been filed, because it was based on FBI wrongdoing and an Obama DOJ plot that was blessed by Obama officials at the highest level, and possibly by Obama himself.”

That is the story.  But it’s a story the media don’t want to tell, because they’d be telling it on themselves.  Where they can’t avoid it, the mainstream media are burying the ugliness under prattle about almost anything else.

Typical is the AP report that appeared widely on Friday, whose four leading paragraphs contained not a single word acknowledging that there was anything wrong with the Flynn prosecution.  Instead, the reporters digress on how the case was “a rallying cry for the president and his supporters in attacking the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation,” that the dismissal request came “even though prosecutors for the past three years have maintained that Flynn lied to the FBI,” and, of course, that “Flynn himself admitted as much, pleading guilty before asking to withdraw the plea[.]”  In the Detroit News print edition, the AP article dawdles through seven paragraphs before there’s a hint in paragraph eight that the FBI’s Flynn interview was an illegal trap, “conducted without any legitimate investigative basis.”  Anyone still reading by paragraph 16 finally learns that an FBI official’s handwritten notes document how the goal of interviewing Flynn was to trap him in a lie so they could destroy him.

The media hammering on Flynn’s guilty plea is meant to crowd out all the wretched details of prosecutorial abuse, leaving only enough room for their alternative suggestions of reality.  One of their suggestions is that history has no record of a prosecutor dropping a charge against a defendant who has already pleaded guilty.  This is ridiculous, but they’ve been suggesting this at the top of their lungs, swearing that what happened last Thursday was an unprecedented, egregious abuse of power by Bill Barr because he’s Trump’s puppet, pure and simple.  To help keep this gaslight burning among friendly media, Obama himself leaked his view that “[t]here is no precedent that anybody can find for someone who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free” (italics mine).

Jonathan Turley, a liberal and no supporter of Trump, quickly corrected the former president, suggesting he may want to check his research with his own former attorney general, Eric Holder.  Turley explains in detail how “Holder moved to dismiss such a case, based on prosecutorial errors in front of the very same judge, Judge Emmet Sullivan,” and further corrects Obama that Flynn wasn’t charged with perjury.  Not only is Turley able to point to legal precedent that Obama said nobody could find, but Turley can cite the federal court rule specifically “created for this purpose,” a rule tied to “other rules mandating this action when there is evidence of prosecutorial misconduct or fundamental questions about the underlying case[.]”

You wouldn’t know it from current reporting, but an allegation of prosecutorial misconduct didn’t use to make liberals yelp with rage.  Before last Thursday, progressives were quite sympathetic to defendants who were squeezed by unscrupulous prosecutors into pleading to something they didn’t do — in other words, defendant who say they’re guilty, but they aren’t.  It’s not a fact.  But right now, in the new normal, the party that’s convinced that the vast majority of prison inmates are the innocent victims of systemic abuse now venerate an extorted plea agreement as the epitome of the American judicial system at its best.

They have brought this calamity on themselves.  For some time now, the go-to progressive tactic has been to oversimplify every controversy into a Manichean “narrative” that pits absolute goodness against unspeakable evil.  Among the other purposes that framing Mike Flynn was meant to serve was to show the good angels of St. James Comey and the Mueller team slaying the wicked and traitorous Trump appointee by sheer force of righteousness.  The problem now is that Flynn is looking less villainous all the time, and Comey and the special counsel team are stinking more of brimstone than they already did.  Once you’ve seen that note about “get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired,” it’s hard to unsee it.  Americans might even find out that Flynn didn’t lie to the FBI at all.  In last week’s motion to dismiss, U.S. attorney Timothy Shea said, “[T]he Government does not believe it could prove that Mr. Flynn knowingly and willfully made a false statement beyond a reasonable doubt.”

But liberals wanted the Flynn narrative to be a battle between good and evil.  There has to be a villain, and if it isn’t Flynn, then there’s nobody left but Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Brady, Rosenstein, Mueller, Weissmann, Van Grack, yada, yada, yada, Hillary, and Barack Obama.  The left desperately needs the disputed fact that Flynn is guilty of lying to the FBI, as something Americans can be convinced outweighs all the other facts — the genuine facts too numerous to mention — that have piled up to become the tottering Tower of Babel of the Russia hoax.

And somebody just took that fact away from them.

When facts are stubborn things, the left just tell more stubborn lies
[Byline T.R. Clancy]

American Thinker (edited)
12 May 2020

He who knows his enemy and himself well will not be defeated easily. ~ Sun Tzu


Anyone who believes a word from the Democratic Party or its Praetorian Guard media at this point is pathologically gullible.

The Full List: 37 Obama Officials Involved In Flynn Unmasking Revealed – Senate Judiciary Committee Ready To Hold Hearings

GOP Sens. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa released documents on Wednesday listing the declassified names of Obama-era officials who sought to “unmask” former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

The List includes President Obama’s Chief of Staff, Denis McDonough, former FBI Director James Comey, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, former Ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, and the last person named is former Vice President Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee. The list includes 37 individuals, but it’s clear that Obama knew even though he was not directly named.

Here’s a complete (REDACTED) list in the order listed:

From Fox News:
♦ U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations–Samatha Power
♦ Director for National Intelligence–James R. Clapper
♦ Deputy Chief of Mission–Kelly Degnan
♦ U.S. Ambassador to Italy and the Republic of San Marco–John R. Phillips
♦ Director of the CIA–John O. Brennan
♦ OIA Director–Patrick Conlon
♦ Secretary of the Treasury–Jacob Lew
♦ Acting Assistant Secretary Treasury–Arthur “Danny” McGlynn
♦ Deputy Secretary of the Treasury–Sarah Raskin
♦ Under Secretary Treasury–Nathan Sheets
♦ Acting Under Secretary Treasury–Adam Szubin
♦ U.S.NATO Defense Advisor (DEFAD)–Mr. Robert Bell
♦ U.S. Representative to the NATO Military Committee–VADM Christenson
♦ Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation–James Comey
♦ Chief Syria Group–[REDACTED]
♦ Deputy Assistant Director of NEMC [REDACTED]
♦ U.S.NATO Office of the Defense Advisor (ODA) Policy Advisor for Russia–Lt. Col. Paul Greenhreng
♦ U.S.NATO [REDACTED] Advisor to Ambassador Douglas Lute–[REDACTED]
♦ U.S.NATO Deputy DEFAD–Mr. James Hursh
♦ Chief Syria Group–[REDACTED]
♦ U.S. Deputy Chief of U.S. Mission to NATO (USNATO)–Mr. Litzenberger
♦ U.S. Permanent Representative (PermRep) to NATO–Ambassador Douglas Lute
♦ U.S.A.-DOE-IN-Executive Briefer
♦ U.S.NATO Political Officer[REDACTED]–Mr. Scott Parrish
♦ U.S.A. – DOE – Deputy Secretary of Energy–Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall
♦ U.S.A.- DOE-IN – Executive Briefer–[REDACTED]
♦ U.S.NATO Political Advisor (POLAD)–Mr. Tamir Waser
♦ COS [REDACTED]
♦ CMO [REDACTED]
♦ DCOS [REDACTED]
♦ U.S. Ambassador to Russia–John Tefft
♦ CMO [REDACTED]
♦ U.S. Ambassador to Turkey–Ambassador Bass
♦ Chief of Staff to the President of the United States–Denis McDonough
♦ Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Intelligence Integration–Michael Dempsey
♦ CIA/CTMC–[REDACTED]
♦ Vice President of the United States–Joseph R. Biden

The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold hearings on Spygate and issues related to unmasking requests made by Obama officials against General Mike Flynn.

“The Judiciary Committee will begin holding multiple, in-depth congressional hearings regarding all things related to Crossfire Hurricane starting in early June,” Lindsey Graham, the chairman of the Judiciary committee, said in a statement Thursday.

The Judiciary Committee will begin holding the hearings in early June.

“Our first phase will deal with the government’s decision to dismiss the Flynn case as well as an in-depth analysis of the unmasking requests made by Obama Administration officials against General Flynn. We must determine if these requests were legitimate,” Graham said.

During an interview with Fox Business on Thursday morning, President Donald Trump spoke out about the long list of Obama administration officials, including former Vice President Joe Biden, who unmasked his former national security advisor Michael Flynn.

The President slammed the former administration saying that this was the “greatest political crime” in American history and said that the Obama officials involved with the unmasking should be punished.

“It was the greatest political crime in the history of our country,” President Trump told Fox host Maria Bartiromo. “If I were a Democrat instead of a Republican, I think everybody would have been in jail a long time ago, and I’m talking with 50-year sentences. It is a disgrace what’s happened. This is the greatest political scam, hoax in the history of our country.”

President Trump went on to shred Obama officials for targeting Flynn.

“People should be going to jail for this stuff and hopefully, a lot of people are going to have to pay,” President Trump said. “No other president should have to go through, and I’ll tell you, Gen. Flynn and others are heroes, heroes, because what’s happened to them. They weren’t after Gen. Flynn. They wanted him to lie about me. Make up a story.”

Please share this article wherever you can. It is the only way we can work around their censorship and ensure people receive news about issues that the mainstream media suppress.

The Full List: 37 Obama Officials Involved In Flynn Unmasking Revealed – Senate Judiciary Committee Ready To Hold Hearings
[Byline Natalie Dagenhardt]
Copyright © 2017 Right Journalism All rights reserved

Right Journalism (edited)
14 May 2020

See: List of request to unmask General Flynn. Furnished by Senator Grassley


Historically speaking, Congressional hearings are a great way for things to be sent down the memory hole and conveniently forgotten.

As their characters and behaviors indicate, the socialist democrats howl, whine, and lie, and encourage the mobilization of their minions and the parasites burrowed into the federal bureaucracy to infect the will of normal Americans. They do this by falsely accusing us and those who represent us of doing exactly what they are doing and what they intend to do once Trump leaves office. The goals they are projecting and telegraphing is to seize power again and permanently disenfranchise legal American citizens – and they are happy to take the risk of literally ripping the country apart in order to do it.

The media is in collusion of course, and is a willing and eager accomplice in this coordinated campaign of mass deception and bolshevistic slander. Notice how no one in the mainstream media points out how the Democrats perjury or lying conveniently disappears simultaneously across the entire mediascape just when the Democrats desperately need  to shift their narrative? None of the media hacks or talking heads ever mention it because they are part of it. The cabal of leftist democrats and their media minion’s problem, however, is that any new information reality means that they can start a controversy, yet, they are unable to control it. Theirs is an utterly predictable pattern as they freak out about some imagined atrocity they themselves have concocted and their need to blame someone or something else for their own conjured up victimization drama. And most certainly, there will be the desperate need to apply some new form of Hitler meme.

As for “Obamagate

Scandal refers to disgraceful, shameful, or degrading acts or conduct that brings about disgrace or offends the moral sensibilities of society. It can be any defamatory reports or rumors or malicious gossip especially slander that causes damage to reputation or character. Scandal can also refer to a libelous action or statement.

In closing, these following words of wisdom inform us, “When there is no enemy within, the enemies outside cannot hurt you.” 

The solution then, is to recognize those “enemies” for who and what they are, and remove them; if necessary by the same methods they would wish to use upon us.

“Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.”

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s