Skip to content

Technopathocracy

2020/12/20

Reality of the temporal universe forever remains something of an illusion to humankind, ordinary people  forever continue blindly groping around inside the box they have created by their own forms of ignorance.

When one’s cohorts are so stupid they will believe anything their representatives say, they can be told bald-faced lies at will, and then act on them.

As such, a pathocracy is a totalitarian form of government in which absolute political power is held by a psychopathic elite, and their effect on the people is that the entire society is ruled and motivated by purely pathological values.

Humankind often deceives itself, more often than not, the human mind establishes its collectively perceived realities on nothing beyond the strictly small material dimension in which the human race is believed to exist. This notion further reduces and compartmentalizes such limited and constricted knowledge into nothing more than false, disjointed, extremely minute and shallow concepts of the whole, while falling short of understanding the vastness of the real truths it contains within.  Now as inherent as it is within the past, there are many whom increasingly refuse to face, approach, or even acknowledge the facts of the countless and multifaceted forms of observable phenomena that objectively exist, all simply because they prefer to remain in the deceptive comforts of narrow-mindedness, unwilling to “change” that longstanding devotion to some limited and enslaved thought process as it casts them further and further into an ever darkened abyss of pure ignorance. Unfortunately, some of them are the very ones that judge and govern us.


The Screaming and the rending of robes.

Queue Camille Saint-Saëns – Danse Macabre

Supreme Court Responds To Claims That Roberts Screamed At Other Justices Over Texas Election Lawsuit
by Tyler Durden

A spokesperson for the U.S. Supreme Court disputed a report that claimed Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts shouted at the eight other justices in a room in the high court, urging them not to the Texas election lawsuit against four other key states.

A spokesperson for the U.S. Supreme Court disputed a report that claimed Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts shouted at the eight other justices in a room in the high court, urging them not to the Texas election lawsuit against four other key states.

As guidance, the court “has been conducting its conferences remotely by phone since March when the building closed due to the pandemic,” a Supreme Court spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email on Friday in response to a question about the claim.

The statement contradicts what a GOP Texas elector, Matt Patrick, said earlier this week, claiming that an anonymous person said that “the Justices went into a closed room” to determine whether to take the Texas lawsuit that was eventually dismissed. Then, according to the elector, “When the Texas case was brought up he said he heard screaming through the walls as Justice Roberts and the other liberal Justices were insisting … afraid of what would happen if they did the right thing.”

The claim first appeared on Hal Turner’s website, sourcing an alleged “clerk for one of the [Supreme Court] justices.” It is unclear where Patrick obtained his information.

“The Justices met in a closed and sealed room, as is standard,” Turner’s website said, citing the alleged Supreme Court whistleblower.

“Usually it is very calm, however today we could hear screaming all the way down the hall. They met in person, because they didn’t trust telephonic meeting as secure. Chief Justice Roberts was screaming, ‘Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?’”

According to the Supreme Court’s website, the justices have not met in person for months in the midst of the CCP virus pandemic.

“The Court will hear all oral arguments scheduled for the November and December sessions by telephone conference. In keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19, the Justices and counsel will all participate remotely. The oral arguments are scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. On days when more than one case will be heard, there will be a three minute pause before the second case begins,” the court’s website says.

Another Republican elector in Texas entered information about the alleged Supreme Court argument during the Electoral College meeting on Monday, Dec. 14, suggesting the other GOP electors should not rely on “hearsay.”

“Sending a message like this to a body of legislators or judicial officers is not going to get the attention you want to get. Nobody knows what happened in that conference room on purpose. Hearing yelling, the triple hearsay, quadruple hearsay now about what is going on in that room, you cannot make your decision on that basis,” the other elector, Jim Pickle, said.

The Supreme Court, since Dec. 11, has drawn significant criticism from President Donald Trump and other Republicans for not taking up Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s lawsuit, saying essentially that majority of the court’s justices showed a lack of moral character for not hearing the case in light of alleged election fraud.

“Now, you have the Supreme Court that really just decided, it seems like, on a political whim to not hear this case when clearly you have the interests of 80 million American voters whose votes were disenfranchised based on the corruption, based on the ignoring the rules in these states,” Trump attorney Jenna Ellis told Newsmax.

“How they could pass on this is shocking. I think it’s morally outrageous.”

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times

ZeroHedge (edited)
18 December 2020

Fearmongering has never been about saving people!

It becomes obvious that political and media figures with a crisis/control agenda always work with a goal to bully stubborn realists into silence. Ever relying on spurious claims using obtuse figures who bank on their hypnotic audiences to mistake them for well-informed persons, while they most always play some inaccurate “consensus” card to get their erroneous points across. And yet, real problems continue to slap them in the face daily; all as they benefit from pontificating and polluting the minds of the gullible, while finding their own deceptions no a problem at all.

 How long before a people fully reject a totalitarian society masquerading under the guise of a democracy, which is ruled and motivated by such purely pathological values?

Danse Macabre

Danse Macabre (1493) by Michael Wolgemut, from the Nuremberg Chronicle of Hartmann Schedel

See Also
When the fearful rule

Blue Dress Proof – What it takes to get the media to believe a Democrat did wrong.

Voter Fraud Never Happens! (Except in these 10,000 cases)

5 More Ways Joe Biden ‘Swamp Elect’ Magically Outperformed Election Norms

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s